Skip to main content
Pregnancy and Ebola in Sierra Leone

Sierra Leone: "This has been the hardest but also the best thing that I have done"


“In all of my years with MSF, this has been the hardest but also the best thing that I have done.”

Midwife Ruth Kauffman is pioneering MSF’s work with pregnant Ebola patients, and proving that – despite everything that was previously thought – pregnant women can survive the disease. She describes how she helped Kumba and Musa, in Sierra Leone, to give birth safely and survive Ebola.

“Before this outbreak, all we really knew about pregnancy and Ebola was that usually the women die either while pregnant or else during the birth. As Ebola is a haemorrhagic fever, once a woman goes into labour, she will most likely bleed to death.

We also knew that unborn babies don’t survive, as the virus appears to concentrate itself in the placenta and in the amniotic fluid which surrounds the fetus.

As the number of people infected in other outbreaks was low – too low to gain an understanding of how Ebola impacted pregnancy – little research had been done.  

But as we’re seeing so many more people infected with the disease in this outbreak, we are learning a lot more about Ebola.

We were surprised that two pregnant women at MSF’s centre in Gueckedou, Guinea, and two more across the border in Foya, Liberia had managed to recover from Ebola, give birth and survive.

Once a woman is better, it seems that the best thing for her to do is birth the fetus, as it has become a ball of concentrated virus in her body. So we began to look at how to do this in a controlled way, that is safe for the people assisting the birth and that will ultimately help the woman survive.

I was working as a midwife at an MSF-run community health centre in Bo, Sierra Leone, when I got a call from our Ebola management centre in Kailahun, in the remote northwest of the country. They said they had one pregnant woman who had almost recovered from Ebola, and asked if I could come and help with the birth. Almost immediately a second pregnant woman was admitted to the same centre. I packed my bags and got a lift up to Kailahun.

There I met Kumba, who was seven months’ pregnant with her third child. She had arrived at the centre with a high viral load, and had been there for about a month.

Kumba knew that her baby was going to be born dead; she had felt no movement for some time.

We wanted to induce Kumba’s labour in as controlled a way as possible. We didn’t want her to go into labour in the middle of the tent. Not only would it be undignified for her, but if there was a lot of infected blood and amniotic fluid around, then it would be risky for everyone.

Kenema hospital, in central Sierra Leone, lost a number of its nurses to Ebola after they attended the birth of an Ebola-positive colleague. Strict infection control is vital.

We needed a place that would be clean and afford some protection – both for Kumba and for those attending her. Luckily the team had just finished constructing a small building for people who needed extra privacy, so we were able to use it for the birth.

We were wearing the standard protective clothing for Ebola, but with extra-long gynaecological gloves on top of the three other layers of gloves. When you are attending a birth, you move around a lot and you really need to make sure that your mask doesn’t slip and that your headgear doesn’t ride up.

You can’t stay inside the high-risk zone, in all your protective gear, for more than an hour at a time. So you also need someone on standby who can come in to relieve you. We had two nurses waiting outside who, even though they didn’t have much experience of birth, were able to monitor Kumba’s vital signs and reassure her.

Before inducing labour, we gave Kumba antibiotics, on the assumption that she would have an infection from carrying around a dead fetus for some time. We also assumed that she would bleed during labour, so we had a lot of anti-haemorrhagic medication ready for after the birth.

Kumba’s labour took about a day and a half, and it went as well as we could have hoped. With Ebola, you don’t want to touch the baby and you don’t want to pull the placenta out; you leave all of that to happen on its own.

What was really amazing about this birth was that, by the next morning, Kumba was stable. She wasn’t bleeding much, and we were able to take out the IVs and the catheter.

The other pregnant woman at the centre was Musa. She had arrived with her two-year-old child, who also had Ebola, and both were now on the way to recovery.

We told Musa that we weren’t going to be able to help her with the birth too much, and she would need to do it herself. This was hard, but with limited time inside the high-risk zone, you have to decide when you’re going to be most useful.

The biggest risk for the mother is right after the birth. If you’re in there for 30 minutes of pushing time, then you don’t have a lot of time or energy left for the next stage – making sure the placenta comes out properly and that she doesn’t bleed.

The birth went really well and within a couple of hours Musa was ready to get up.

Birth is so special, even in these circumstances. Whatever the culture, you are immediately intimate with the woman. To be a part of this intimacy is so rewarding – and even more so in the context of Ebola.

Kumba and Musa’s experiences really confirmed to me that, with the resources and with specialised care, pregnant women can be helped to survive Ebola. We may not be able to save the lives of their unborn children, but we can save theirs. In all of my years with MSF, this has been the hardest but also the best thing that I have done.”

Video

B-roll - Pregnancy and Ebola

When Kumbu, seven months pregnant and suffering from Ebola, was admitted to MSF’s Ebola management centre in Kailahun, Sierra Leone, midwife Ruth Kauffman was called in to help. 
MSF/Fabio Basone